lacboi
STUNTWORLDUSA ELITE MEMBER
Registered: May 27, 2008
Posts: 5,626
|
| | Sept 20, 2009 at 05:03 PM | Reply with quote | #57 |
|
hmm how do i put this simple??? 265hp can be an average rating, 260hp for imp can be peak. and lets look at the torque and then compare the curves to a lt1 imp. and that 409 64ss was fast. and gn depending on year did not have that much power just to let you know more like 245. but we can go on and on but i have to speak on v6s, go race a v6 camaro and see if a 96 impala wins. and lt1s have no topend stock. not dogging them but truth is the truth. gnx numbers were 0-60 under 5 secs and sub 14 sec 1/4 mile. that damn callaway cant even do that and it has 400+ horses.
im not defending a gn because i dont have one . but guess what else any force inducted 231 fwd or rwd has better times than a lt1 b body. so g body,w body, f body, k body> b body lol im j/p. but i go off real world testing/ personal experience. i never seen an impala taillights before and neither the vette the motor that gave the imp its motor, but that aint impessive to me either. i wanna run a new vette but i know right now i dont wanna see 1. oh and i was stock when i was talking bout imps, because anything goes when modded. but i had some mods when i ran away from a c5. but late 80s and early 90s vettes were slow didnt need mods to beat them
__________________
http://www.cardomain.com/id/lacboi
WHAT THEY DO?
Everywhere, turn around and look behind you. |
| Loading... | |